Then in 2013 I was inspired by Patagonia, the company, and what they call the 'responsible economy'. This resulted in the following environmental-related piece, which also touched on collaborative consumption or the sharing economy.
Dec 2013
"Don't buy this jacket."
This is the last thing you would expect a clothing company
to tell consumers on one of the busiest days in the year for retailers, but
this is precisely what adventure apparel brand Patagonia did two years ago. This
headline appeared on its Black Friday ads, which also explained the environmental
impact of producing the jackets.
The ads were part of Patagonia's ongoing campaign to encourage
consumers to buy less and to recycle, repair and reuse instead. The company also
offers a clothing repair service, and recently started accepting trade-ins of
used Patagonia apparel, which are then reconditioned and resold at some of its
stores as 'Worn Wear'.
Such a campaign seems counter-productive to the accepted
business model of selling more products and services to achieve company growth
and profits. So why would Patagonia tell
us to not to buy more of its products?
The answer: to encourage us to reduce our environmental footprint.
And Patagonia, well-known for its environmentalism as well as for making
high-quality (and expensive) outdoor gear, is keen to push the sustainability agenda
further with its latest campaign, known as The Responsible Economy.
Launched recently in September, this two-year campaign aims to
encourage discussion about the need for new business and economic practices
that are not solely based on growth-based capitalism and what Patagonia founder
Yvon Chouinard calls 'insatiable consumerism'.
Since the onset of the global economic recession, more and
more people have become disillusioned with the conventional understanding that relentless growth --
at the expense of everything else -- is necessary for business and economic prosperity.
And Patagonia's Responsible Economy campaign is the latest in efforts to
seek out alternative business and economic models, which has also given rise to
the sharing economy or collaborative consumption.
In 2011, when Freelancers Union founder Sara Horowitz wrote
in The Atlantic about the sharing economy,
she described it as being driven by millions of Americans who recognised that
'endless and thoughtless consumption' was unsustainable both from an ecological
as well as financial standpoint. Recession-hit consumers realised that they
could no longer afford prop up their economy by continuing to spend relentlessly,
to the point of getting themselves into serious debt.
Enter the sharing economy, which is based on the sharing of
resources through online peer-to-peer marketplaces. Mobile and online
technology has made it cheaper and easier for individuals to share underused assets
by renting them, and this in turn is changing the way people think about the
need to own goods. In other words, think access, not ownership.
For instance, why own a car that you use only once a month,
when you can affordably rent a car or a ride? This was the premise for car/ride-sharing
businesses like RelayRides and Lyft. Have an extra bedroom in your home? Convert
that into income by renting it out to tourists via peer-to-peer rental sites
like Airbnb or HomeAway.
By encouraging more
efficient use of resources, collaborative consumption contributes to
environmental and financial sustainability. It also fosters greater
collaboration and community spirit as individuals come together to find viable,
affordable solutions to their needs. The sharing economy relies on shared needs,
trust and the belief that the group is stronger than the individual, Horowitz
writes.
This alternate
economic model, what The Economist
calls 'a post-crisis antidote to materialism and overconsumption', has undeniably
struck a chord among consumers. Today, the sharing economy is said to have expanded
to an estimated value of US$110 billion. But a sure sign of its potential for
further growth is the fact that regulators as well as large corporations are now
paying much closer attention to collaborative businesses.
Big companies are beginning
to embrace these disruptions to their business by joining in. Automotive giant Daimler
has introduced its Car2Go car-sharing service, while General Motors has
invested in RelayRides. Rental business Avis has acquired Zipcar, a forerunner
in the car sharing business. And the success of online textbook rental service
Chegg.com has spurred established book retailers like Barnes and Noble and
Amazon to offer similar services.
It is encouraging
to see the effect of the sharing economy on incumbent businesses, as it can
only spur the growth of more innovative, collaborative and resource-friendly
business models. Yet, the quest for alternative business and economic models
that can balance growth with the need for sustainability as well as social
benefit is not an easy one.
Even Patagonia
faces this challenge; despite spending the past two years persuading consumers
to buy less, its annual sales have increased by almost 38% in the same
period. Patagonia vice president of
environmental affairs Rick Ridgeway recently told BusinessWeek that the company's
growth is overshadowing
the benefits it is producing from sustainability initiatives.
Back in 1968, ecologist Garett
Hardin wrote about the 'tragedy of the commons', a situation where shared
limited resources are depleted by individuals acting independently based on
their self-interest, in contrary to the long-term best interests of the group.
According the Global Footprint Network, humanity has been overspending
ecologically since the 1970s and we are now utilising resources
equivalent to 1.5 planets. And given the world's current
population and consumption trends, we will need the equivalent
of two Earths to support us by the 2030s.
If we are to achieve a responsible economy, we need responsible companies
and policymakers who are not just focused on growth at all costs, but who
recognise the importance of balancing social, ecological and economic goals. We
also need to become more responsible consumers ourselves, to be more
reflective and thoughtful about what we buy, how and why we spend, and consider the impact of our
consumption decisions.
If we are to circumvent the tragedy of the commons on our
finite planet, we must remember that we're all in this together. We need to
move out of our self-interested individual selves, and come together and work
collectively for our long-term sustainability.
Lim Yin Foong does not
own any Patagonia stocks or clothing, but would be happy to share with anyone
who does. Now based in the UK, Yin Foong was the founding editor of Personal
Money, a Malaysian personal finance magazine published
by The Edge Communications.
Ends…
No comments:
Post a Comment